# SteelEye Alternative | Comma Compliance

Comma Compliance is an alternative to SteelEye. Off-device capture, WORM-protected storage, designed against SEC 17a-4 and FINRA 4511.

Source: https://commacompliance.com/compare/steeleye-alternative
Last updated: 2026-09-25

---

Vendor Comparison

# Comma Compliance vs. SteelEye

Purpose-built for communications archiving. 40+ channels, flat pricing, and capture code you can actually audit.

[Book a demo](/get-in-touch)

SteelEye is a compliance platform used globally. If you’re evaluating SteelEye competitors or looking for a SteelEye Alternative for SEC or FINRA compliance, this page compares Comma Compliance and SteelEye across architecture, channel coverage, and exam readiness.

## At a Glance

SteelEye is a broad compliance platform: communications archiving, trade surveillance, and regulatory reporting. Comma Compliance is purpose-built for communications archiving and supervision, with flat pricing, open-source transparency on key capture modules, and exam-ready case management included.

## Side-by-Side Comparison

| Feature | Comma Compliance | SteelEye |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Architecture | End-to-end — capture, archive, supervision, policy matching, and exam-ready case management, with [open source transparency.](https://github.com/comma-compliance) | End-to-end — capture, archive, communications surveillance, trade surveillance, and regulatory reporting |
| Built-in archive | Yes — included in platform | Yes |
| WORM storage | [Yes](/resources/worm-storage) — written at point of capture | Yes |
| iMessage capture method | [Point-of-delivery](/post/archive-imessage-for-sec-compliance) — not iCloud-dependent | Capture methodology not publicly detailed |
| WhatsApp capture | Captures both WhatsApp Business and personal WhatsApp | SteelEye has historically partnered with TeleMessage for WhatsApp capture; its current capture methods are not fully documented |
| Signal capture | Yes — [open-source capture code](https://github.com/comma-compliance/signal-capture) published on GitHub | SteelEye has historically partnered with TeleMessage for Signal capture; its current capture methods are not fully documented |
| Transparency | WhatsApp, Signal and Android text messaging capture code published openly on GitHub — no NDA, no request required | Proprietary; capture methodology not publicly disclosed |
| Channels supported | [40+ channels](/platform-integrations) where conversations happen: iMessage, WhatsApp, Signal, SMS, Voice, Microsoft 365, Teams, Exchange, OneDrive, Gmail, Google Workspace, Slack, Zoom, Webex, Bloomberg Chat, Salesforce, Telegram, and more. | Email, voice, chat/mobile, financial messaging, and collaboration channels |
| Personal vs. business separation | Automatic contact-based filtering — personal contacts can be excluded automatically | On BYOD, iMessage and Signal capture is tied to the device’s number, so personal messages are included. SteelEye recommends consent or dedicated business devices. |
| Policy processing | Yes — built in | Yes |
| Custom policy matching | Yes | Yes |
| Case management | [Exam-ready](/exam-ready-cases) cases, with [e-discovery](/e-discovery) for preparing a scoped handoff to legal teams or outside counsel | eDiscovery, legal hold, and trade reconstruction |
| AI compliance monitoring | Real-time policy scanning; human validation before escalation; no client data used for training without consent | Compliance CoPilot |
| Data ownership | Client retains full ownership; never sold or shared outside authorized sub-processors | Not publicly detailed |
| Pricing model | [Transparent pricing, enterprise pricing available.](/pricing) All platforms included. No per-connector fees, no storage overages, no export fees. | Not publicly listed; enterprise contract required |
| Free trial | 14-day free trial, no credit card required | Not publicly offered |

*Competitor feature descriptions reflect publicly available documentation and may not capture all capabilities. Information is reviewed periodically.*

## When SteelEye may be a better fit

-   Teams correlating communications with market data and price activity
-   Firms requiring trade reconstruction across orders and executions

Due Diligence

## Questions to Ask Any Compliance Vendor

-   01

    Where exactly is the message first captured - at the point of delivery, or after a backup or sync cycle?

-   02

    What conditions must be true for a message to be captured? What happens if any of those conditions aren't met?

-   03

    If a user edits or deletes a message before capture occurs, what version gets archived?

-   04

    Can you show documentation - architecture diagrams, code, or an independent audit - of how your capture actually works?

-   05

    Where are encryption keys stored, and who controls them?

-   06

    Are all channels included in the base price, or are there per-connector fees?

-   07

    Are there export or egress fees?

-   08

    Does your case management workflow support regulatory examination prep?

-   09

    Can cases be opened directly from flagged message threads?

-   10

    Is any client data used to train your models? Under what conditions?

-   11

    Can we adjust, refine, or contribute feedback to my policy models? (e.g., different languages, customer-complaint responses)

## See why firms switch from SteelEye to Comma.

A 20-minute walkthrough — real capture, real-time flagging, transparent pricing.

[Book a demo](/get-in-touch)[Pricing](/pricing)

## Also compare

### [Global Relay Alternative](/compare/global-relay-alternative)

Global Relay lacks support for personal Signal compared to Comma Compliance.

See full comparison

### [LeapXpert Alternative](/compare/leapxpert-alternative)

LeapXpert requires a separate archive and has per-channel pricing.

See full comparison

### [SnippetSentry Alternative](/compare/snippetsentry-alternative)

SnippetSentry requires a separate archive and acts as a capture model only.

See full comparison